ECIRs registered by Enforcement Directorate under PMLA (2002-2024)
Source: Press Information Bureau / Ministry of Finance, Lok Sabha replies
Advocate Subodh Bajpai represents accused persons, witnesses, and target companies in white-collar and economic-offence matters across Delhi NCR. The criminal vertical at Unified Chambers and Associates was launched in 2026 to sit alongside the existing institutional debt-recovery practice — covering Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) proceedings, Enforcement Directorate matters, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) matters under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, anticipatory bail, Delhi High Court bail, and bank-fraud defence.
Forums covered: the Delhi High Court (criminal benches), the PMLA Special Court and CBI Special Court at Patiala House, and the six Delhi NCR sessions courts — Tis Hazari, Saket, Rohini, Dwarka, Karkardooma, and the Patiala House district. Punjab & Haryana High Court for NCR-Haryana matters; Allahabad High Court for NCR-UP matters; Supreme Court of India through AOR-associated practice.
The practice operates under the post-1 July 2024 reset — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 — while continuing to apply the Supreme Court’s established framework on PMLA constitutionality (Vijay Madanlal Choudhary, 2022), grounds-of-arrest disclosure (Pankaj Bansal, 2024), bail categorisation (Satender Kumar Antil, 2022), anticipatory bail (Sushila Aggarwal, 2020), and quashing parameters (Bhajan Lal, 1992).
Detailed practice notes, niche-specific landing pages, and engagement protocols are maintained on the firm site at unifiedchambers.com/criminal-defence-delhi.
A money-laundering investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 follows a defined statutory sequence, and the window to intervene differs at each stage. The overview below is general procedural information; any specific matter turns on its own facts and the predicate offence involved.
The Enforcement Directorate records an Enforcement Case Information Report — an internal document that opens the investigation. Unlike an FIR, the ECIR is not necessarily furnished to the accused; the scheduled (predicate) offence in the related FIR or complaint defines the alleged proceeds of crime.
The ED summons persons to give evidence and produce records under Section 50. Statements recorded under Section 50 are admissible, so preparation before each appearance matters — the scope of questioning, the documents produced, and the line between cooperation and self-incrimination all need to be worked through in advance.
Where the ED arrests under Section 19, it must possess material forming the basis of arrest and must furnish the written grounds of arrest to the accused — a mandatory safeguard affirmed in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India. A defective grounds-of-arrest communication is itself a basis to challenge the arrest.
The ED may provisionally attach property believed to be proceeds of crime under Section 5. The attachment is valid for 180 days and must be placed before the Adjudicating Authority, where the owner can contest whether the property is in fact proceeds of crime traceable to the predicate offence.
Within 180 days, the Adjudicating Authority decides under Section 8 whether to confirm the attachment. This is the first substantive forum to test the ED's case on the existence and tracing of proceeds of crime, with an appeal lying to the Appellate Tribunal.
Bail in PMLA matters is governed by the twin conditions in Section 45: the court must be satisfied there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty of the offence and is unlikely to offend while on bail — read with the Supreme Court's framework in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022) and the bail jurisprudence that has followed.
The PMLA trial proceeds before the designated Special Court — at Patiala House for Delhi matters — frequently alongside the predicate-offence trial. Defence work spans the tracing of proceeds, the validity of the predicate offence, and the admissibility and weight of Section 50 statements.
Banks and NBFCs whose fraud complaints feed CBI and ED references can read the recovery-side and empanelment practice at counsel for banks & NBFCs. For the advocate’s background and the firm’s two verticals, see About Advocate Subodh Bajpai and the legal advisory overview.
Each niche has a dedicated landing page on the firm site with detailed procedural notes, fee-engagement structure, and the relevant Supreme Court anchors. The links below open the firm-site pages.
The data points below are drawn from the Ministry of Finance, Press Information Bureau, Lok Sabha replies, Supreme Court judgments, and the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG). They establish the substantive scale of the white-collar criminal-defence landscape — PMLA, ED, CBI, and the post-1 July 2024 BNSS regime — within which Unified Chambers and Associates practises across Delhi NCR.
ECIRs registered by Enforcement Directorate under PMLA (2002-2024)
Source: Press Information Bureau / Ministry of Finance, Lok Sabha replies
Total property attached under PMLA (2014-2024)
Source: Ministry of Finance, ED enforcement data, 2024
PMLA conviction rate (25 of 5,422 cases as of Jan 2023)
Source: Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3263, January 2023
Criminal cases pending across Indian courts under the new BNSS regime
Source: National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG), 2024
Maximum judicial custody before chargesheet under BNSS Section 187 (formerly CrPC Section 167)
Source: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Section 187
Section 45 PMLA bail standard — accused must satisfy both 'reasonable grounds for believing not guilty' and 'no likely re-offence'
Source: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. UoI (2022) 11 SCR 382
Fresh ECIR or FIR notice? Pre-arrest concern? Delhi High Court bail brief? Initial assessment within 48 hours. Engagements proceed under written letter of engagement.