1. Parties and Identification
The engagement letter identifies the parties — the institutional client (the bank, NBFC, or ARC by legal name and registered office) and the chambers (Unified Chambers And Associates, with Senior Partner Advocate Subodh Bajpai as the engaging advocate). Both parties are clearly identified with corporate identification details, registered offices, and authorised-representative names.
Typical Clauses
- Client: [Legal Name of Bank / NBFC / ARC] (CIN: [______]), having its registered office at [______]
- Counsel: Unified Chambers And Associates, New Delhi, represented by Senior Partner Advocate Subodh Bajpai (Bar Council of Delhi enrolment [______])
- Effective date of engagement: [DD/MM/YYYY]
- Authorised representatives for the engagement on each side, with contact details
2. Scope of Engagement
The scope clause specifies precisely what work the chambers are engaged to perform. Sophisticated institutional engagement letters define scope by mandate area, geography, forum, and matter type — not as open-ended retainers. Scope changes outside the defined ambit require a written amendment or a new engagement letter.
Typical Clauses
- Mandate areas (e.g., SARFAESI Section 13 enforcement, DRT original applications, IBC Section 7 admissions, Section 138 NI Act prosecution, OTS documentation)
- Forums covered (e.g., Delhi High Court, DRT Delhi, DRAT, NCLT Delhi, NCLAT, District Courts NCR)
- Geographic scope (e.g., Delhi-NCR; pan-India by case)
- Matter-type allocation (active matter referrals, opinion-counsel work, retainer-based portfolio coverage)
- Excluded scope (e.g., tax advisory, regulatory enforcement matters, criminal prosecution outside Section 138 NI Act)
3. Fee Structure
Fee provisions follow Bar Council of India norms and reflect the agreed structure — matter-fee, retainer, hybrid, or per-appearance. The chambers do not work on contingency or success-only fees. GST, statutory levies, and out-of-pocket expense reimbursement are addressed separately. Fee invoicing follows the institution's standard procurement and accounts-payable frameworks.
Typical Clauses
- Fee structure (matter-fee schedule, monthly retainer, or hybrid)
- Out-of-pocket expense reimbursement (court fees, travel, document-procurement, third-party-counsel briefing)
- GST charging at the prevailing statutory rate
- Invoicing cadence and AP-process integration (typically monthly for active engagements)
- Payment terms and late-payment provisions
4. Reporting Cadence and MIS Integration
The reporting clause sets out how the chambers will keep the institutional client informed. Strong engagement letters specify cadence, format, content, and escalation triggers. Reporting can be tailored to the institution's internal MIS — custom data fields, specific status definitions, bespoke escalation triggers can all be accommodated.
Typical Clauses
- Active-matter status: weekly written status reports per active matter
- Portfolio review: monthly summary across all active matters with categorical status breakdowns
- Escalation alerts: immediate notification of adverse interim orders, missed limitation deadlines, or material developments requiring client decision
- MIS integration: data exports in client's preferred format (CSV/Excel/JSON) for ingestion into legal-management software
- Quarterly governance review: portfolio-level discussion with the client's GC office or panel-procurement function
5. Conflict-Management Framework
The conflict clause sets out the discipline that governs how the chambers handle conflicts of interest. It includes initial conflict-screening at engagement, ongoing disclosure obligations during the relationship, and the escalation process when borderline conflicts arise. This framework is foundational to long-term institutional engagements.
Typical Clauses
- Initial conflict-screen at engagement-letter execution against existing chambers' clients
- Ongoing duty of proactive disclosure where new instructions create potential conflicts
- Escalation framework for borderline conflicts (consultation with the institutional client before acceptance of new conflicting work)
- Right of the institutional client to require declination of new conflicting instructions
- Confidentiality obligations across the conflict-management framework
6. Confidentiality and Privilege
The confidentiality clause covers attorney-client privilege under Indian law, the chambers' obligation to maintain confidentiality of all client information, restrictions on disclosure to third parties, and exceptions for legally compelled disclosure (court orders, regulatory inquiries). Document-handling and digital-storage provisions ensure the institution's data is treated with appropriate care.
Typical Clauses
- Attorney-client privilege under the Indian Evidence Act 1872
- Chambers' confidentiality obligations covering all client information
- Restrictions on disclosure to third parties without express written consent
- Exceptions for legally compelled disclosure (court orders, regulatory inquiries)
- Digital-document handling: encryption at rest, access controls, audit logging
- Document-retention and destruction protocols at conclusion of engagement
7. Term, Termination and Transition
The term clause sets out the duration of the engagement — typically open-ended for retainer relationships, matter-life-bound for matter-fee structures. Termination provisions cover notice periods, completion of in-progress matters, and orderly transition to successor counsel. The institutional client's continuity-of-representation interest is explicitly preserved.
Typical Clauses
- Initial term (open-ended for retainer; matter-life for matter-fee)
- Termination by either party with [______] days' written notice
- Completion of in-progress matters notwithstanding termination of the broader engagement
- Orderly transition to successor counsel including file handover and knowledge transfer
- Survival clauses (confidentiality, indemnity, fee accruals)
8. Limitation of Liability and Indemnity
Liability clauses are negotiated case-by-case. Standard institutional engagement letters include reasonable limitations on the chambers' liability (e.g., capped at the fees paid for the relevant matter), exclusions for indirect or consequential losses, and indemnity provisions reflecting the risk allocation between the parties. The chambers maintain professional indemnity coverage at appropriate levels.
Typical Clauses
- Liability cap (e.g., capped at fees paid for the specific matter giving rise to the claim)
- Exclusion of indirect or consequential losses
- Reciprocal indemnity provisions reflecting the risk allocation
- Professional indemnity coverage details
- Force majeure provisions
9. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution
Engagement letters are governed by Indian law. Disputes arising from the engagement are typically resolved through structured negotiation, followed by arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 if structured negotiation fails. Forum selection is typically Delhi.
Typical Clauses
- Governing law: Laws of India
- Jurisdiction: Courts at Delhi for any judicial proceedings
- Dispute resolution mechanism: structured negotiation followed by arbitration under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996
- Seat and venue of arbitration: New Delhi
- Language of proceedings: English
10. Bar Council of India Compliance
All engagements at the chambers comply with the Bar Council of India Rules — Part VI Chapter II Rule 36, the Advocates Act 1961 Section 35, and applicable BCI guidance on advocate conduct. The engagement letter records the parties' acknowledgement of this compliance framework and the chambers' obligation to operate within it.
Typical Clauses
- Compliance with BCI Rules Part VI, Chapter II, Rule 36
- Compliance with Section 35 of the Advocates Act 1961
- No commercial promises or success-only fee structures
- Acknowledgement that fees are professional advocate fees, not commercial-advisory pricing
- Right of the chambers to decline instructions inconsistent with BCI compliance obligations
Notice: This page is an illustrative reference asset for institutional due-diligence. It is not a contractual offer or a binding commitment. Actual engagement letters are executed bilaterally after conflict-screening, scope discussion, and fee-framework agreement. The template structure is consistent with Bar Council of India Rules — Part VI, Chapter II, Rule 36 — and reflects the chambers’ standard institutional-engagement practice.
Next steps for institutional enquiries
Banks, NBFCs, and ARCs interested in empanelment with Unified Chambers should review the institutional-counsel page at /for-banks-nbfcs for the full empanelment process and the empanelment-enquiry checklist of information to send. Direct enquiries are received at legal@unifiedchambers.com.
Institutional Counsel page →