Legal advice and litigation on banking, lending and loan-recovery disputes at Unified Chambers And Associates, New Delhi. The chambers give legal advice and act in litigation only; they do not arrange loans or act as intermediaries. The work covers review of loan and security documents, replies to recovery action, and disputes before the DRT, the NCLT and the courts.
Independent legal review of facility agreements, term sheets, security documents, and intercreditor arrangements
Replies to Section 13(2) notices, challenges to NPA classification, and challenges to other banking action
Borrower defence in original applications, securitisation applications under Section 17, and Recovery Officer proceedings
Applications under Sections 7, 9 and 10 before the NCLT, the CIRP, and personal-guarantor matters
Legal advice on restructuring proposals, one-time settlement terms, and settlement documents
Disputes between borrowers, promoters, and personal guarantors arising from credit transactions
Legal review of shareholder agreements, term sheets, and related transaction documents
Coordinated defence where recovery action runs in more than one forum at once
Confidential review of the matter, the documents in dispute, and the legal questions raised.
Detailed review of facility agreements, security documents, recovery notices, and procedural correspondence.
Identification of legal grounds, available defences, and the choice of forum across SARFAESI, DRT, IBC, or civil court.
Drafting of replies, affidavits, applications, and pleadings; filing at the appropriate forum within statutory timelines.
Representation at the Delhi High Court, the DRT and DRAT at Delhi, the NCLT at New Delhi, and other forums through to final orders and appeals.
In-depth notes on the substantive law, procedural framework, and strategic considerations for this practice area. Written by Advocate Subodh Bajpai for clients, junior counsel, and others researching this area of Indian law.
Indian businesses face legal disputes arising from banking, lending and credit transactions: challenges to wrongful NPA classification, defence against SARFAESI enforcement, DRT proceedings, disputes over the interpretation of loan documents, claims arising from fraud or misrepresentation in lending, recovery suits by NBFCs, and disputes between investors and investee companies under shareholders' agreements and term sheets.
Unified Chambers And Associates provides legal advice, drafting and litigation across this field. The chambers do not arrange capital, prepare loan applications, introduce investors or act as financial intermediaries — those are commercial activities outside legal practice under the Bar Council of India Rules. What the chambers offer is legal advice on the substantive and procedural law that governs banking and lending transactions in India.
A typical secured credit facility involves a sanction letter, a facility agreement, security documents (mortgage, hypothecation, guarantee), charge filings with the Registrar of Companies (Form CHG-1), and ancillary documents covering covenants, events of default and changes in interest. These documents are ordinarily prepared by the lender.
Independent review before signature can identify clauses that need attention: provisions on penalties for non-compliance, which under the Reserve Bank of India's circular on Fair Lending Practice – Penal Charges in Loan Accounts (18 August 2023, applicable from 2024) are to be levied as reasonable 'penal charges' and not as 'penal interest' added to the rate of interest, and are not to be capitalised; cross-default clauses linking multiple facilities; broad event-of-default definitions that permit acceleration for minor breaches; and waivers of rights. Points identified before signature can be raised with the lender while the terms are still open; after disbursal, the borrower's negotiating position is much narrower.
Asset classification under the Reserve Bank of India's prudential norms is a common source of dispute. Classification of an account as an NPA opens the way to SARFAESI enforcement, affects credit-information reports, and has wider commercial consequences. Wrongful classification — for example, where payments were not correctly appropriated, or the account was not overdue for the required period — is a recurring ground of challenge.
A borrower contesting classification may raise it in a representation under Section 13(3A) in response to a Section 13(2) notice; in an application to the DRT under Section 17 once measures under Section 13(4) are taken; and, where the lender is amenable to writ jurisdiction, in a writ petition before the High Court. The grounds include the factual basis for classification, departures from the RBI norms, and procedural irregularity in the lender's review.
Recovery defence often involves SARFAESI, DRT and IBC proceedings at the same time. It begins with a review of the lender's position: whether the classification is sustainable, whether the Section 13(2) notice complies with the Act, whether any possession was lawfully taken, whether the DRT pleadings are maintainable, and whether the lender's evidence will stand.
The options include a representation under Section 13(3A); an application under Section 17, with an interim-relief application, once Section 13(4) measures are taken; a writ petition where the lender is amenable to writ jurisdiction and no efficacious alternative remedy exists; negotiation of a One-Time Settlement; a response to an IBC Section 7 application on the questions the Code allows at admission; and counter-claims where the lender's conduct gives rise to an independent claim. The choice depends on the facts, the strength of each ground, and the borrower's commercial timeline.
Disputes between companies and their investors arise from breaches of term sheets and shareholders' agreements, drag-along and tag-along rights, valuation disagreements at exit, and breaches of representations and warranties in share-purchase transactions. The substantive law is in the Indian Contract Act 1872, the Companies Act 2013 (including Sections 241 to 244 on oppression and mismanagement), SEBI regulations where listed companies are involved, and any arbitration agreement between the parties.
The forum depends on the dispute and the contract: the NCLT for oppression and mismanagement and class actions under the Companies Act; an arbitral tribunal where the agreement so provides; the civil courts for contractual recovery; and the Delhi High Court for writ and commercial matters within its jurisdiction. Work in this area covers both companies and investors.
Several categories of dispute recur in Indian loan documentation. Disputes over penal charges arise where a lender levies charges for non-compliance that are not disclosed in the loan agreement and key fact statement, or that do not follow the RBI's penal-charges framework. Acceleration disputes arise where a lender invokes an event of default for a minor or technical breach and demands the entire outstanding. Cross-default disputes arise where default in one facility is used to accelerate unrelated facilities. Stamp-duty disputes arise where documents are insufficiently stamped, affecting their admissibility in evidence.
These issues are raised in DRT and civil proceedings, avoided by careful drafting at origination, and dealt with in settlement documents that resolve the disputed elements.
The Bar Council of India Rules (Part VI, Chapter II, Rules 47 to 52) restrict an advocate from personally engaging in business. In keeping with them, Unified Chambers And Associates do not provide capital arrangement, loan-application services, investor introductions, financial intermediation, or commercial advice on capital strategy.
What the chambers provide is the legal work around banking and lending transactions: documentation review, dispute resolution, recovery defence, regulatory opinions and litigation. For commercial or financial advice outside legal practice, clients should consult independent qualified professionals.
No. Under the Bar Council of India Rules an advocate may not carry on any other business. The chambers give legal advice and act in litigation on banking, lending and recovery disputes; they do not arrange loans or act as intermediaries.
Yes. The practice covers representations and objections to a Section 13(2) notice under Section 13(3A), securitisation applications before the DRT under Section 17 against measures taken under Section 13(4), and appeals to the DRAT under Section 18.
The chambers handle the legal aspects. Commercial questions that fall outside legal practice, such as the terms of a new lending arrangement, are for the client and its other advisers.
Contact Unified Chambers And Associates about a matter in this practice area.
Contact Chambers →The other practice areas at Unified Chambers And Associates are listed below.